• General
  • Distribution
  • Impact
  • Management
  • Bibliography
  • Contact
prev
  • Fruit of Rhamnus cathartica (Photo: Paul Wray, Iowa State University, www.forestryimages.org)
  • Rhamnus cathartica flowers (Photo: Chris Evans, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org)
  • Close up of Rhamnus cathartica leaf (Photo: Chris Evans, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org)
  • Close up - showing leaf structure of Rhamnus cathartica (Photo: Chris Evans, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org)
  • Bark and buckthorn of Rhamnus cathartica (Photo: Chris Evans, The University of Georgia, www.forestryimages.org)
  • Leaf formationof Rhamnus cathartica (Photo: Paul Wray, Iowa State University, www.forestryimages.org)
next
Common name
European buckthorn (English), European waythorn (English), Carolina buckthorn (English), nerprun purgatif (French), �pine noire (French), buckthorn (English), common buckthorn (English), nerprun cathartique (English), Hart's thorn (English), espinheiro-cerval (Portuguese), Kreuzdorn (German), tamuje (Portuguese), cervispina (Spanish)
Synonym
Similar species
Frangula alnus, Rhamnus alnifolia, Rhamnus lanceolata
Summary
Rhamnus cathartica commonly known as common or European buckthorn is a deciduous small tree that prefers lightly shaded conditions. It is tolerant of many soil types and can be found in open oak woods, deadfall openings in woodlands and edges of woodlands. It may also be found in prairies and open fields. It tends to form dense, often even-aged thickets, crowding and shading out native shrubs and herbs. In fire-adapted ecosystems the lack of vegetation under buckthorn prohibits fires. R. cathartica is also an alternate host of the crown rust of oats. Fire is very effective in controlling R. cathartica and is a preferred method when the population is young. In wetlands water tables have been artificially lowered in order to attempt to control this species.
Species Description
Mehrhoff et al. 2003 states that, \"R. cathartica is a deciduous small tree or coarse shrub 2 to 6m tall. The glabrous branches usually have shoots that are tipped with stout spines. The leaves are arranged opposite to sub-opposite, are elliptic to ovate, 3.6 to 7.2cm long, and can be acute or obtuse. They are glabrous and have minutely serrate margins. The lateral veins (usually 3, but can have 2 or 4) on each side are strongly upcurved. The plant leafs out early in spring and leaves remain on the plant late into the autumn, when most of the native species have already lost their leaves.\"
Notes
WDNR (2003) reports that, \"The first few individuals established in a natural area are usually from seeds transported by birds. Once these individuals begin to produce seed, R. cathartica can rapidly form dense thickets. The vigor of R. cathartica is positively correlated to light availability.\"
Lifecycle Stages
(North American region) WDNR (2003) states that, \"R. cathartica flowers from May through June and fruit ripens August through September; glossy buckthorn blooms from late May until the first frost and produces fruit from early July through September. The abundant fruits are eaten birds, thus encouraging the long-distance dispersal of horticultural plantings. Seedlings establish best in high light conditions, but can also germinate and grow in the shade. The exotic buckthorns have very rapid growth rates and resprout vigorously after they have been cut.\"

Converse (1984) states that, \"Seedlings invade apparently stable habitats. Recruitment is most successful where there is ample light (Leitner 1984, Kowlaski 1968) and exposed soil (Andreas 1983). Tests of R. cathartica seedlings grown under various densities and light intensities showed reduced growth as shade increased (Leitner 1984). In North America R. cathartica leafs out prior to most woody deciduous plants in late April to mid-May. The leaves are retained into late September through October and sometimes into November (Hanson and Grau 1979, Lovely 1983). Leaf-drop possibly occurs earlier in open areas than in shade (Pauly 1984).\"

Uses
Wieseler (1999) states that, \"R. cathartica was introduced to North America as an ornamental shrub, for fence rows, and wildlife habitat. Introduction of buckthorn was based on its hardiness and ability to thrive in a variety of soil and light conditions.\" Converse (1984) states that, \"R. cathartica has been cultivated for hedges (Wyman 1971), forestry uses, and wildlife habitat. This species is also used in shelter belt planting (Hubbard 1974). Naturalized habitats include pastures, fencerows, roadsides, and slopes of ravines.\"
Habitat Description
Wieseler (1999) states that, \"R. cathartica prefers lightly shaded conditions. An invader mainly of open oak woods, deadfall openings in woodlands, and woods edges, it may also be found in prairies and open fields. It is tolerant of many soil types, well drained sand, clay, poorly drained calcareous, neutral or alkaline, wet or dry.\" Gale (2000) states that, \"R. cathartica seems to do best in well-lit, well-drained areas, but is tolerant of a broad range of soil types (neutral to alkaline, sandy or clayey soils) and light conditions (TNC 1995, in Gale 2000). Across its range, R. cathartica is a particularly problematic invasive of deciduous forest communities. For example, the eastern deciduous forest community, found throughout much of the American portion of its range, has experienced extensive invasion.\"

Converse (1984) states that, \"The native habitats of R. cathartica are diverse and include the understory of open oak (Leitner 1984, Tansley 1968), oak-beech, or ash woods (Tansley 1968, Hinneri 1972). It also occurs in riverine woods (Leitner 1984, Tansley 1968), thickets on exposed rocky sites (Hinneri 1972), hedgerows (Eldin 1968, Polunin 1969), pastures (Polunin 1969, Tansley 1968, Duffey et al. 1974) and alkaline shrub carr fens (Godwin and Bharucha 1932, Tansley 1969). It grows in well-drained sand, clay, or poorly drained calcareous soils, but prefers neutral or alkaline soils. It is less vigorous in dense shade, and may grow on woodland edges in sunny southern or western exposures (Leitner 1984).\"

Reproduction
Wieseler (1999) states that, \"R. cathartica is a dioecious plant, meaning that each plant produces only male or female flowers and fruiting trees are always female. Most of the fruits fall directly beneath the shrubs, creating a dense understory of seedlings characteristic of R. cathartica stands. The plentiful fruit is eaten by birds and mice and is known to produce a severe laxative effect, helping distribute seeds through birds, often far from the parent plant. R. cathartica often establishes beneath trees at the edges of forests and fields.\"

Converse (1984) states that, \"Natural reproduction is primarily sexual; asexual means are absent or insignificant. R. cathartica reaches seed bearing age quickly (Godwin 1936). Flowers of R. cathartica may be polygamous, but are usually dioecious (Barnes and Wagner 1981) and bloom May through June during leaf expansion (Fernald 1950). The globose black drupes of R. cathartica ripen in August through September, and each contains three or four grooved seeds. They ripen in July through August and have two or three ungrooved seeds (Fernald 1950). Fruit production of both species is abundant each year (Hubbard 1974). Fruit is efficiently dispersed usually by starlings, blackbirds, woodducks, elk, mice (Ridley 1930), cedar waxwings, robins and blue jays. Mice are also seed predators (Godwin 1936). Apparently, few bird species readily tolerate the anthranquinones (emodin) present especially in the immature fruit, preventing premature dispersal (Trail and Dimond 1979). R. cathartica retains fruit into, or throughout, the winter. Because R. cathartica fruit is retained on the plant longer and is therefore more visible to birds, seeds may be dispersed more frequently over long distances.\" The authors continue on to state that, \"The importance of water dispersal is unknown, but dry fruit of R. cathartica can float six days and seeds float three days before sinking\".

Nutrition
Converse (1984) states that, \"The vigour of \"R. cathartica is often related to light availability. It seems that seedlings of R. cathartica establish readily under partial light.\"

Principal source: IPANE, 2001 Rhamnus cathartica (Common buckthorn , European buckthorn)
Wieseler, 1999 Rhamnus cathartica L.

Compiler: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)

Review: Liam Heneghan Associate Professor of Environmental Science Co-Director, Insititute for Nature and Culture DePaul University Chicago USA

Publication date: 2005-08-29

Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Rhamnus cathartica. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/speciesname/Rhamnus+cathartica on 07-10-2024.

General Impacts
Mehrhoff et al. 2003 states that, \"R. cathartica tends to form dense, even-aged thickets, crowding and shading out native shrubs and herbs, often completely obliterating them. Dense buckthorn seedlings prevent native tree and shrub regeneration. In fire-adapted ecosystems such as savannas and prairies, the lack of vegetation under buckthorn prohibits fires. Buckthorn control is also of interest to small grain producers; the shrub is an alternate host of the crown rust of oats, which affects oat yield and quality.\" Schmidt and Whelan (1999) conducted a study on the effects of exotic shrubs on songbird nests and concluded that the, \"Data show that exotic R. cathartica affected songbird nest success in two ways. First, exotic shrubs directly enhanced nest predation (primarily by large mammals) in American Robins, perhaps through a combination of lower nest height, the absence of sharp thorns, and a branch architecture that may facilitate predator movement.\" Gale (2000) reports that, \"An extended growing season likely gives R. cathartica a competitive advantage over native plant species as well. Harrington et al. (1989, in Gale 2000) showed that R. cathartica leaves remain on the tree an average of 58 days longer than its native counterparts, Cornus racemosa and Prunus serotina. Its leaves emerge earlier and senesce later. In both cases, upper canopy foliage is largely absent. Consequently, photosynthesis under high light availability conditions is significantly greater for R. cathartica than for native shrub species.\" R. cathartica is a host for soybean crop pest Aphis glycines, the Soybean aphid (Ragsdale et al. 2003). Converse (1984) states that, \"R. cathartica rapidly forms dense, even-aged thickets. In an open site, R. cathartica establishment is followed by lateral crown spread. This extension continues until branches touch adjacent shrubs. The large leaves and continuous canopy create dense shade. Even-aged thickets are common in both wetlands and in woodland under stories.\"

The litter of R. cathartica decomposed rapidly, and promotes the rapid decomposition of litter in the forest floor adjacent to where it grown (Heneghan et al. 2002). Soils under R. cathartica have been shown to have modified nutrient cycling – with a higher percent N and C, and impact that may persists after the plant has been physically removed (Heneghan et al. 2004).

Management Info
Physical: Heidorn (1990) states that, \"Fire is very effective in controlling R. cathartica and is the preferred method whenever feasible. Regular prescribed fire will kill seedlings and shrubs of these species in fire-adapted upland and wetland (e.g. fens, sedge meadows, marshes) sites. Some control usually will be evident after the first burn. However, for complete control in established stands of R. cathartica, burning yearly or every other year may be required for 5-6 years or more. In wetlands, where the water table has been artificially lowered, restoration of water levels often will kill R. cathartica. When burning is not feasible, larger trees can be cut or girdled and re-sprouts clipped as they occur. In upland areas where burning is not feasible, cut stumps can be treated with Trimec or Roundup to prevent re-sprouting.\"

ODNR (2003) states that, \"Prescribed burning has been used to control R. cathartica in some natural areas. Fire will top kill stems, however re-sprouting will occur and seed germination may increase. Several years of burning may be necessary to control these species and may not be appropriate in some natural areas. Hand pulling may be successful in small infestations, although several seasons may be required, as re-sprouting will occur if part of the root is left behind. This method also disturbs the soil, increasing seed germination. Repeated mowing has been reported effective in maintaining open areas and preventing seedling establishment.\"

Chemical: Gale (2000) states that, \"The best time of year to use herbicides on i>R. cathartica is just after the native grasses and wildflowers have gone dormant (Boudreau and Wilson 1992, in Gale 2000). Herbicide applications may be done early in the season just after the trees have leafed out and before the trees have begun to bud, but those conducted in the fall or early winter appear to be the most effective (Aho 2000, Bohnen 2000, Solecki 1997, in Gale 2000).\"

ODNR (2003) states that, \"Control of R. cathartica with systemic herbicides has been successful in many situations. Application of Roundup®, Accord®, Glypro® or Garlon 4® to cut stumps during the growing season and in warm days of winter has proven to be effective. Other application methods may include basal bark and foliar application. A foliar application of Garlon 3A® in dense thickets may be very effective in the spring and fall. Without treatment, stems will re-sprout vigorously after cutting due to the extensive root system.\"

Countries (or multi-country features) with distribution records for Rhamnus cathartica
ALIEN RANGE
NATIVE RANGE
  • albania
  • algeria
  • armenia
  • austria
  • azerbaijan
  • belarus
  • belgium
  • bulgaria
  • czech republic
  • denmark
  • estonia
  • ex-yugoslavia
  • finland
  • france
  • germany
  • greece
  • hungary
  • iran, islamic republic of
  • ireland
  • italy
  • kazakhstan
  • kyrgyzstan
  • latvia
  • lithuania
  • moldova, republic of
  • morocco
  • netherlands
  • norway
  • poland
  • romania
  • russian federation
  • spain
  • sweden
  • switzerland
  • tajikistan
  • turkey
  • ukraine
Informations on Rhamnus cathartica has been recorded for the following locations. Click on the name for additional informations.
Lorem Ipsum
Location Status Invasiveness Occurrence Source
Details of Rhamnus cathartica in information
Status
Invasiveness
Arrival date
Occurrence
Source
Introduction
Species notes for this location
Location note
Management notes for this location
Impact
Mechanism:
Outcome:
Ecosystem services:
Impact information
Mehrhoff et al. 2003 states that, \"R. cathartica tends to form dense, even-aged thickets, crowding and shading out native shrubs and herbs, often completely obliterating them. Dense buckthorn seedlings prevent native tree and shrub regeneration. In fire-adapted ecosystems such as savannas and prairies, the lack of vegetation under buckthorn prohibits fires. Buckthorn control is also of interest to small grain producers; the shrub is an alternate host of the crown rust of oats, which affects oat yield and quality.\" Schmidt and Whelan (1999) conducted a study on the effects of exotic shrubs on songbird nests and concluded that the, \"Data show that exotic R. cathartica affected songbird nest success in two ways. First, exotic shrubs directly enhanced nest predation (primarily by large mammals) in American Robins, perhaps through a combination of lower nest height, the absence of sharp thorns, and a branch architecture that may facilitate predator movement.\" Gale (2000) reports that, \"An extended growing season likely gives R. cathartica a competitive advantage over native plant species as well. Harrington et al. (1989, in Gale 2000) showed that R. cathartica leaves remain on the tree an average of 58 days longer than its native counterparts, Cornus racemosa and Prunus serotina. Its leaves emerge earlier and senesce later. In both cases, upper canopy foliage is largely absent. Consequently, photosynthesis under high light availability conditions is significantly greater for R. cathartica than for native shrub species.\" R. cathartica is a host for soybean crop pest Aphis glycines, the Soybean aphid (Ragsdale et al. 2003). Converse (1984) states that, \"R. cathartica rapidly forms dense, even-aged thickets. In an open site, R. cathartica establishment is followed by lateral crown spread. This extension continues until branches touch adjacent shrubs. The large leaves and continuous canopy create dense shade. Even-aged thickets are common in both wetlands and in woodland under stories.\"

The litter of R. cathartica decomposed rapidly, and promotes the rapid decomposition of litter in the forest floor adjacent to where it grown (Heneghan et al. 2002). Soils under R. cathartica have been shown to have modified nutrient cycling – with a higher percent N and C, and impact that may persists after the plant has been physically removed (Heneghan et al. 2004).

Red List assessed species 0:
Outcomes
[18] Environmental Ecosystem - Habitat
  • [9] Reduction in native biodiversity
  • [1] Habitat degradation
  • [8] Modification of fire regime
[8] Socio-Economic
  • [8] Damage to agriculture
Management information
Physical: Heidorn (1990) states that, \"Fire is very effective in controlling R. cathartica and is the preferred method whenever feasible. Regular prescribed fire will kill seedlings and shrubs of these species in fire-adapted upland and wetland (e.g. fens, sedge meadows, marshes) sites. Some control usually will be evident after the first burn. However, for complete control in established stands of R. cathartica, burning yearly or every other year may be required for 5-6 years or more. In wetlands, where the water table has been artificially lowered, restoration of water levels often will kill R. cathartica. When burning is not feasible, larger trees can be cut or girdled and re-sprouts clipped as they occur. In upland areas where burning is not feasible, cut stumps can be treated with Trimec or Roundup to prevent re-sprouting.\"

ODNR (2003) states that, \"Prescribed burning has been used to control R. cathartica in some natural areas. Fire will top kill stems, however re-sprouting will occur and seed germination may increase. Several years of burning may be necessary to control these species and may not be appropriate in some natural areas. Hand pulling may be successful in small infestations, although several seasons may be required, as re-sprouting will occur if part of the root is left behind. This method also disturbs the soil, increasing seed germination. Repeated mowing has been reported effective in maintaining open areas and preventing seedling establishment.\"

Chemical: Gale (2000) states that, \"The best time of year to use herbicides on i>R. cathartica is just after the native grasses and wildflowers have gone dormant (Boudreau and Wilson 1992, in Gale 2000). Herbicide applications may be done early in the season just after the trees have leafed out and before the trees have begun to bud, but those conducted in the fall or early winter appear to be the most effective (Aho 2000, Bohnen 2000, Solecki 1997, in Gale 2000).\"

ODNR (2003) states that, \"Control of R. cathartica with systemic herbicides has been successful in many situations. Application of Roundup®, Accord®, Glypro® or Garlon 4® to cut stumps during the growing season and in warm days of winter has proven to be effective. Other application methods may include basal bark and foliar application. A foliar application of Garlon 3A® in dense thickets may be very effective in the spring and fall. Without treatment, stems will re-sprout vigorously after cutting due to the extensive root system.\"

Bibliography
15 references found for Rhamnus cathartica

Management information
Converse, C. K. 1984. Element Stewardship Abstract for Rhamnus cathartica, Rhamnus frangula (syn. Frangula alnus). The Nature Conservancy.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
Available from: http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/esadocs/documnts/franaln.html [Accessed 27 July 2004]
Gale, S. W. 2000. Control of the Invasive Exotic Rhamnus cathartica in Temperate North American Forests. Restoration and Reclamation Review, Volume 6 Fall 2000 Invasive Species & Ecosystem Restoration Student On-Line Journal. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
Heidorn, R. 1990. Vegetation Management Guideline: Exotic Buckthorns. Illinois Nature Preserves Commission: Vegetation Management Guide, 1:(5).
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
Available from: http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/chf/outreach/VMG/buckthorn.html [Accessed 09 January 2004]
Mehrhoff, L. J., J. A. Silander, Jr., S. A. Leicht, E. S. Mosher and N. M. Tabak. 2003. IPANE: Invasive Plant Atlas of New England. Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
Available from: http://webapps.lib.uconn.edu/ipane/browsing.cfm?descriptionid=24 [Accessed 09 January 2004]
Wieseler, S. 2001. Rhamnus cathartica L. Plant Conservation Alliance, Alien Plant Working Group.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
Available from: http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/rhca1.htm [Accessed 09 January 2004]
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2003. Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica). Non-Native Invasive Species: Plants.
Summary: Information on description, economic importance, distribution, habitat, history, growth, and impacts and management of species.
Available from: http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/er/invasive/factsheets/buckthorns.htm [Accessed 09 January 2004]
General information
Gill, D. S. and P. L. Marks, 1991. Tree and Shrub Seedling Colonization of Old Fields in Central New York. Ecological Monographs 61(2): 183-205.
Godwin, H., 1943. Rhamnus cathartica L. The Journal of Ecology 31(1): 69-76
Heneghan, L., Carlton Rauschenberg., Farrah Fatemi., Margaret Workman., 2004. The impact of an Invasive Shrub (Rhamnus cathartica L.) on some Ecosystem Properties in urban woodland in Chicago, Illinois. Ecological Restoration. 22(4) 275-280.
Heneghan, L. Clay, C. and Brundage C., 2002. Rapid Decomposition of buckthorn litter may change soul nutrient levels. Ecological Restoration, 20(2) 108-111.
ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System). 2002. Online Database Rhamnus cathartica
Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and bioscience articles from BioOne journals.
Available from: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=28573 [Accessed March 2005]
Ragsdale, D. W., D. J. Voegtlin, and R. K. O Neil. 2004. Soybean aphid biology in North America. Entomological Society of America 97(2): 204-208.
Summary: Information regarding species impact on soybean and its natural enemies.
Schmidt, K. A., & C. J. Whelan. 1999. Effects of Exotic Lonicera and Rhamnus on Songbird Nest Predation. Conservation Biology 13(6): 1502-1507
Summary: Information regarding species impact on songbirds.
USDA-GRIN (Germplasm Resources Information Network). 2003. Rhamnus cathartica. National Genetic Resources Program [Online Database] National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland.
Summary: Information on common names, synonyms, and the distributional range of species.
Available from: http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_search.pl?Rhamnus+cathartica [Accessed 09 January 2004]
USDA-NRCS (Natural Resource Conservation Service). 2002. Rhamnus cathartica. The PLANTS Database Version 3.5 [Online Database] National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA.
Summary: Available from: http://plants.usda.gov/java/nameSearch?mode=Scientific+Name&keywordquery=Rhamnus+cathartica [Accessed 09 January 2006]
Contact
The following 1 contacts offer information an advice on Rhamnus cathartica
Heneghan,
Liam
Organization:
Associate Professor of Environmental Science Co-Director,
Address:
Insititute for Nature and Culture DePaul University 2325 North Clifton Avenue Chicago, IL 60614-3207
Phone:
773 325-2779
Fax:
773 325-7448
Rhamnus cathartica
European buckthorn , European waythorn , Carolina buckthorn, nerprun purgatif, �pine noire, buckthorn, common buckthorn , nerprun cathartique, Hart's thorn , espinheiro-cerval, Kreuzdorn, tamuje, cervispina
Date assessed
Year published
Eicat category
Justification for EICAT assessment
Confidence rating
Mechanism(s) of maximum impact
Countries of most severe impact
Description of impacts
Assessor
Contributors
Reviewers
Recommended citation
(2024). Rhamnus cathartica. IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT).