• General
  • Distribution
  • Impact
  • Management
  • Bibliography
  • Contact
Common name
Hundtunga (English, Sweden), dog bur (English), beggar's lice (English), houndstongue (English), dog's tongue (English), hound's tongue (English), gypsy flower (English), common houndstongue (English), Lengua de perro (Spanish), Lingua-di-cane vellutina (Italian, Italy), hondstong (Dutch, Netherlands), sheep lice (English), Orvosi ebnyelvufu (English, Hungary), Harilik rass (English, Estonia), Rohtokoirankielet (English, Finland), Hundetunge (English, Norway), ebnyelvufu (English, Hungary), common bur (English), Užanka lékarská (English), woolmat (English), Gewone hondstong (Dutch, Netherlands), Ostrzen pospolity (Polish, Poland), glovewort (English), Langue-de-chien (French, France), Hundetunge (Danish, Denmark), rats and mice (English), Cynoglosse officinal (French, France), Gemeine Hundszunge (German, Germany), Echte Hundezunge (German, Germany), Echte Hundszunge (German, Germany), Læge-Hundetunge (Danish, Denmark), Gebräuchliche Hundszunge (German, Germany), Közönséges ebnyelvufu (English, Hungary)
Synonym
Cynoglossum officinale , f. bicolor
Similar species
Cynoglossum boreale, Cynoglossum grande, Cynoglossum occidentale, Hackelia spp., Lappula spp., Verbascum thapsus
Summary
Cynoglossum officinale otherwise known as hound's tongue in common vernacular is a biennial herbaceous plant that invades disturbed areas and waste places. It occurs widespread throughout North America, in the U.S. and Canada. The leaves of the plant, in particular the rosette leaves, are high in toxic alkaloids that can poison livestock. Hound's tongue also has a thick, deep taproot that makes it successful at competing with native vegetation for soil resources. The seeds of hound's tongue are burred so they easily attach to the fur of animals or on the clothing and shoes of humans allowing them to spread to new uninfested areas.
Species Description
Hound's tongue, C. officinale, is a biennial with two distinct growth phases, a first year rosette vegetative growth phase, followed by a second year reproductive flowering phase (McAdoo et al. 2002). The first year basal rosette has leaves that are dark green, 15-20cm long and 2-5cm wide, petiolate and elliptical, tapering to the base and pubescent on both upper and lower surfaces (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). During the second year an erect stem that reaches heights of 30-120cm produces alternate, sessile, or clasping, leaves (Fertig & Arnett, 2001) that are narrower in the upper portions of the plant with the lower leaves broader (Zouhar, 2002). The infloresence is a raceme on branches forming into cymes in the axils of the upper leaves (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Flowers are perfect (USGS-NPWRC, 2006), with five blunt, green pubscent sepals (Fertig & Arnett, 2001), fused into the shape of a star (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). The corolla is five-lobed, reddish-purple and fused at the lower part into a cylindrical tube (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). The anthers are located along the throat of the corolla (Fertig & Arnett, 2001) and the pistil is simple (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). The infloresence usually bears no more than 10 flowers but up to 35 flowers can develop (Zouhar, 2002).The fruit is an indehiscent, divided into 1-4 nutlets, that are 5-7mm long, flattened along the top and covered with small hooked burrs or spines (USGS-NPWRC, 2006).
Lifecycle Stages
Cynoglossum officinale is a biennial with two distinct growth phases in its lifecycle, a first year vegetative rosette growth, followed by a second year reproductive phase (McAdoo et al. 2002). Hound's tongue's vegetative growth diesback in the first year after a hard frost, but its taproot remains alive and stores carbohydrate reserves which act as an antifreeze (Harrison, undated). Seed germination occurs in the spring, mainly in the months of March and April, after a vernalization period to break seed dormancy along with some form of scarification or softening of the seed coat (Zouhar, 2002). Seedling establishment is not competitive until root system is well-developed (Zouhar, 2002).Vernalization is required for initiating reproductive growth the following spring (Harris & DeClerke-Floate, 2005). In the second year stems sprout from the taproot and flowering occurs from May to July with fruits developing from July to October (Fertig&Arnett, 2001). Fruits dry and either fall from the parent plant or may be retained on the parent plant until the next spring, delaying seed germination until the following year (USGS-NPWRC, 2006) thus creating an above-ground seed bank (Zouhar, 2002).
Uses
Hound's tongue was used traditionally in the external treatment of wounds and burns as well as boiled for a cure for coughs. The use of this plant medicinally is not recommended by modern practitioners (Harrison, undated).
Habitat Description
Cynoglossum officinale establishes on disturbed areas, roadsides, rangeland, old fields and meadows, forest margins, riparian corridors (Fertig & Arnett, 2001) and coastal sand dunes (Zouhar, 2002). Cold temperatures during the growing season limit its northern range and is typically found at subalpine elevations or lower (Zouhar, 2002). Due to a deep and thick taproot, hound's tongue can establish well in dry sites with a minimum of 300mm of annual precipitation and grows poorly in waterlogged soils(Zouhar, 2002). Hound's tongue is shade tolerant and performs well in the shade at dry sites (Harris & DeClerke-Floate, 2005), but does best in full sun (Zouhar, 2002). This species relates positively to closed canopies (Zouhar, 2002). It grows best in sandy, alkaline soils and not in acidic or clay soils (Zouhar, 2002). Periodic disturbance favours its establishment and expansion (Harrison, undated) with 10% or more of bare ground increasing establishment (USGS-NPWRC, 2006).
Reproduction
Reproduction of hound's tongue is through seed production and does not reproduce vegetatively (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). The flowers are self-compatible, but greater seed production occurs when cross-pollinated (Harris & DeClerke-Floate, 2005). Pollination is through insects, mainly bumble bees, but also thrips, butterflies and other bee species (Zouhar, 2002). Seed production rates vary between 50 -2000 seeds per plant (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Seed viability and germination are strongly dependent on soil depth. The germination rate is low for seeds exposed on the soil surface(~4%) compared to alomst 100% germination for seeds buried 1-3cm below the surface of the soil (Zouhar, 2002). Seeds that are buried deepr than 5cm germinate but do not emerge (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Seeds are not persistent in the soil, with a viability of one year buried (USGS-NPWRC, 2006) and up to two years on the soil surface (McAdoo et al. 2002).

Principal source: Zouhar, K., 2002, Cynoglossum officinale, Fire Effects Information System [online], U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, , Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory;
United States Geological Survey- Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Aug. 2006, Species Abstracts of Highly Disruptive Exotic Plants at Scotts Bluff National Monument Cynoglossum officinale, United States Department of the Interior;
McAdoo, J.K., Johnson, W.S., Wilson, R.E., Donaldson, S., & Graham, J., 2002, Fighting Invasive Weeds- A Northeastern Nevada Landowner's Guide to Healthy Landscapes, University of Nevada, Reno, Cooperative Extension Service.

Compiler: National Biological Information Infratsructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)

Review:

Publication date: 2007-08-07

Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Cynoglossum officinale. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1193 on 18-05-2024.

General Impacts
Cynoglossum officinale can effectively compete with native vegetation for soil water and nutrients due to its extensive branching and deep taproot (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Hound's tongue seed also leaches allelopathic chemicals from its seeds which in scientific studies (Rashid et al. 2005) has shown to inhibit the germination and root elongation of some species of grass and broadleaf plants. The leaves of C. officinale also contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids that can prevent the reproduction of liver cells and cause illness and death in livestock (Graham & Johnson, undated). The attachment of seeds to the coats and fur of domesticated animals results in extra labour hours for sanitation and cleaning (Harris & DeClerke-Floate, 2005).
Management Info
Preventative measures: Prevntion strategies are the best option for control if they can be implemented before an infestation develops. Some preventative measures include using native species, regulating and limiting land use options, enforcing quarantine and border intercepts before they enter the region, using local soils and substrates, and most importantly monitoring (Mullin et al. 2000).

Physical: Mechanical methods of control only work to reduce the seed bank available for re-establishment of the species. Digging and pulling are not effective in control unless the root crown of the plant is severed several inches below the surface of the soil (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002). Tilling or cultivation is a good method of control in areas with small infestations, but it has to be repeated frequently to make sure that root reserves are depleted and that new growth does not occur (McAdoo et al. 2002). Mowing several centimeters above the surface of the plant when in flowering can reduce the seed spread and seed bank, but mowing needs to be repeated to ensure that plant recovery is reduced (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Fire will probably kill the aerial portion of the plant while a severe fire may be needed to kill the taproot (Zouhar, 2002). Fire effects on this plant still need to be further studied. Postfire may help in the establishement of hound's tongue by reducing or eliminating the competition by other species opening up the canopy, etc. (Zouhar, 2002). Fire is not recommended for the control of hound's tongue at this time.

Cultural: Any control plan should have a revegetative component when dealing with hound's tongue, as bare soil from eradication will only increase the population of hound's tongue through successive generations or another weedy species could invade into the areas hound's tongue was displaced from (McAdoo et al. 2002). Regulating livestock grazing on rangeland is important so that competitive species are not overstressed and have enough vigor to recover and keep invasive species like hound's tongue from invading (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002). Overseeding with competitive grass or native species is another cultural plan that should and could be incorporated into a chemical or biological control plan.

Chemical: A variety of chemical herbicides have been used for the control of hound's tongue, picloram, 2,4,D-amine, metsulfuron (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002), chlorsulfuron, and dicamba (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Follow the label for application strengths and rates, and use the right chemical for your particular area, depending on the sensitivity of the site, other surrounding vegetation and management logistics. For small infestations, a spot spray may work best and reduce the effect the herbicide is going to have on other vegetation, wildlife, and the envrionment. Timed chemical applications in the spring or early summer on first year's growth, or in the spring when the second-years growth begins to bolt has shown 97% and 77% control respectively (USGS-NPWRC, 2006).

Countries (or multi-country features) with distribution records for Cynoglossum officinale
ALIEN RANGE
NATIVE RANGE
  • albania
  • armenia
  • austria
  • azerbaijan
  • belarus
  • belgium
  • czech republic
  • denmark
  • estonia
  • ex-yugoslavia
  • finland
  • france
  • georgia
  • germany
  • greece
  • hungary
  • iran, islamic republic of
  • ireland
  • italy
  • kazakhstan
  • kyrgyzstan
  • latvia
  • lithuania
  • netherlands
  • norway
  • poland
  • romania
  • russian federation
  • spain
  • sweden
  • switzerland
  • turkey
  • ukraine
  • united kingdom
Informations on Cynoglossum officinale has been recorded for the following locations. Click on the name for additional informations.
Lorem Ipsum
Location Status Invasiveness Occurrence Source
Details of Cynoglossum officinale in information
Status
Invasiveness
Arrival date
Occurrence
Source
Introduction
Species notes for this location
Location note
Management notes for this location
Impact
Mechanism:
Outcome:
Ecosystem services:
Impact information
Cynoglossum officinale can effectively compete with native vegetation for soil water and nutrients due to its extensive branching and deep taproot (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Hound's tongue seed also leaches allelopathic chemicals from its seeds which in scientific studies (Rashid et al. 2005) has shown to inhibit the germination and root elongation of some species of grass and broadleaf plants. The leaves of C. officinale also contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids that can prevent the reproduction of liver cells and cause illness and death in livestock (Graham & Johnson, undated). The attachment of seeds to the coats and fur of domesticated animals results in extra labour hours for sanitation and cleaning (Harris & DeClerke-Floate, 2005).
Red List assessed species 0:
Management information
Preventative measures: Prevntion strategies are the best option for control if they can be implemented before an infestation develops. Some preventative measures include using native species, regulating and limiting land use options, enforcing quarantine and border intercepts before they enter the region, using local soils and substrates, and most importantly monitoring (Mullin et al. 2000).

Physical: Mechanical methods of control only work to reduce the seed bank available for re-establishment of the species. Digging and pulling are not effective in control unless the root crown of the plant is severed several inches below the surface of the soil (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002). Tilling or cultivation is a good method of control in areas with small infestations, but it has to be repeated frequently to make sure that root reserves are depleted and that new growth does not occur (McAdoo et al. 2002). Mowing several centimeters above the surface of the plant when in flowering can reduce the seed spread and seed bank, but mowing needs to be repeated to ensure that plant recovery is reduced (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Fire will probably kill the aerial portion of the plant while a severe fire may be needed to kill the taproot (Zouhar, 2002). Fire effects on this plant still need to be further studied. Postfire may help in the establishement of hound's tongue by reducing or eliminating the competition by other species opening up the canopy, etc. (Zouhar, 2002). Fire is not recommended for the control of hound's tongue at this time.

Cultural: Any control plan should have a revegetative component when dealing with hound's tongue, as bare soil from eradication will only increase the population of hound's tongue through successive generations or another weedy species could invade into the areas hound's tongue was displaced from (McAdoo et al. 2002). Regulating livestock grazing on rangeland is important so that competitive species are not overstressed and have enough vigor to recover and keep invasive species like hound's tongue from invading (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002). Overseeding with competitive grass or native species is another cultural plan that should and could be incorporated into a chemical or biological control plan.

Chemical: A variety of chemical herbicides have been used for the control of hound's tongue, picloram, 2,4,D-amine, metsulfuron (Kedzie-Webb & Sheley, 2002), chlorsulfuron, and dicamba (USGS-NPWRC, 2006). Follow the label for application strengths and rates, and use the right chemical for your particular area, depending on the sensitivity of the site, other surrounding vegetation and management logistics. For small infestations, a spot spray may work best and reduce the effect the herbicide is going to have on other vegetation, wildlife, and the envrionment. Timed chemical applications in the spring or early summer on first year's growth, or in the spring when the second-years growth begins to bolt has shown 97% and 77% control respectively (USGS-NPWRC, 2006).

Bibliography
17 references found for Cynoglossum officinale

Management information
De Clerke-Floate, R.A., Wikeem, B., & Bourchier, R.S., 2005, Early establishment and dispersal of the weevil, Mogulones cruciger (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) fro biological control of houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale) in British Colombia, Canada, Biocontrol Science and Technology, Vol. 15, no. 2, pp.173-190.
Summary: A journal article abstract that describes the success of a biological control in British Colombia Canada for hound s tongue.
Graham, J., & Johnson, W.S., undated, Managing Houndstongue, University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, Fact sheet-03-49.
Summary: An extension factsheet that was very informative on the biology and ecology of hound s tongue. It also had management options for control as well.
Harrison, S., undated, Common plants on Rangelands in Western Canada Cynoglossum officinale L., Factsheet, Department of Plant Science, Univeristy of Saskatchewan
Summary: A report prepared with basic information on habitat, description, and control options. This site did offer other information in the form of uses, common names, and a similar species.
Available from: http://www.usask.ca/agriculture/plantsci/classes/range/cynoglossum.html [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
Harris, P., & DeClerke-Floate, R., 2005, Classical Biological Control of Weeds Hound s tongue (Cynoglossum officinale L.), Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada(AAFC).
Summary: An online webpage devoted to the general qualities of hound s tongue from description, lifecyle, and habitat, to various methods of control.
Available from: http://res2.agr.ca/lethbridge/weedbio/plant/bhouton_e.htm [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
Kedzie-Webb, S., & Sheley, R.L., July 2002, Houndstongue Biology and Management, MontGuide fact sheet #199709/Agriculture, Montana State Univeristy Extension Services.
Summary: An extension fact sheet from Montana that outlines various control and management techniques that can be used on hound s tongue, along with general biology and ecology information.
Available from: http://www.montana.edu/wwwpb/pubs/mt9709.html [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
McAdoo, J.K., Johnson, W.S., Wilson, R.E., Donaldson, S., & Graham, J., 2002, Fighting Invasive Weeds- A Northeastern Nevada Landowner s Guide to Healthy Landscapes, University of Nevada, Reno, Cooperative Extension Service.
Summary: A very good article on the ecology and management of hound s tongue, in particular on chemical and cultural control of the plant. It also went into detail about the lifecycle and reproductive structures.
Mullin, B.H., Anderson, L.W.J, DiTomaso, J.M., Eplee, R.E., & Getsinger, K.D., Feb. 2000, Invasive Plant Species, Council for Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Issue Paper no. 13, pp. 1-18.
Summary: This paper was used for general management strategies against invasive weed species. There was no focus on Linaria vulgaris for management options, but the paper addressed preventive, regulatory, legislative, and educational approaches to weed management.
Zouhar, K., 2002, Cynoglossum officinale, Fire Effects Information System [online], U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, , Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory
Summary: An excellent article on the habitat and botanical characteristics of hound s tongue along with discussion of fire effects.
Available from: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/plants/forb/cynoff/all.html [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
General information
Fertig, W. & Arnett, M., 28 February 2001, Distribution of Noxious Weeds Within the Habitat of Threatened Plant and Animal Species on F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Prepared for the U.S. Air Force by Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming.
Summary: This report discusses the biology and ecology of hound s tongue along with local distribution and effect on endangered habitat for plants and animals. The description and habitat for hound s tongue are discussed among other invasive weed species.
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), 2007. Species:Cynoglossum officinale
Summary: Available from: http://www.gbif.net/species/13746017/ [Accessed 15 June 2010]
Gotfredsen, E., 2007, Liber Herbarum II: Cynoglossum officinale [online]
Summary: This website was cited for the common names associated with hound s tongue in its native regions.
Available from: http://www.liberherbarum.com/Pn0288.HTM [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System), 2007. Online Database
Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and bioscience articles from BioOne journals.
Available from:http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=31890 [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
Rashid, A., Furness, N.H., Ellis, B.E., & Upadhyaya, M.K, 2005, Inhibition of seed germination and seedling growth by hound s-tongue (Cynoglossum officinale L.) seed leachate, Weed Biology and Management, Vol. 5, no. 3, pp.143-149.
Summary: This article was briefly cited for its ecological impact of hound s tongue on the establishment of other species through seed allelopathy.
United States Department of Agriculture, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program, 2007, Germplasm Resources Information Network, [online database], National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, MD.
Summary: This site was used for the native distribution of hound s tongue.
Available from: http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?12866 [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, 2006, National Invasive Species Information Center, Houndstongue Cynoglossum officinale.
Summary: This website was cited for a common name and was a great source of links to other sites like the extension service reports along with some other management literature.
Available from: http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/plants/houndstongue.shtml [Accessed on 19 March 2007].
United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2007, Plants Profile Cynoglossum officinale, [online].
Summary: The NRCS site gave a map distribution of hound s tongue in the United States.
Available from: http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=CYOF [Accessed on 19 March 2007].
United States Geological Survey- Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center, Aug. 2006, Species Abstracts of Highly Disruptive Exotic Plants at Scotts Bluff National Monument Cynoglossum officinale, United States Department of the Interior.
Summary: A general but well written article on the characteristics of hound s tongue from description to lifecyle and habitat.
Available from: http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/plants/exoticab/scotcyno.htm [Accessed on 16 March 2007].
Contact
The following 0 contacts offer information an advice on Cynoglossum officinale
Cynoglossum officinale
Hundtunga, dog bur, beggar's lice, houndstongue, dog's tongue, hound's tongue, gypsy flower, common houndstongue, Lengua de perro, Lingua-di-cane vellutina, hondstong, sheep lice, Orvosi ebnyelvufu, Harilik rass, Rohtokoirankielet, Hundetunge, ebnyelvufu, common bur, Užanka lékarská, woolmat, Gewone hondstong, Ostrzen pospolity, glovewort, Langue-de-chien, Hundetunge, rats and mice, Cynoglosse officinal, Gemeine Hundszunge, Echte Hundezunge, Echte Hundszunge, Læge-Hundetunge, Gebräuchliche Hundszunge, Közönséges ebnyelvufu
Date assessed
Year published
Eicat category
Justification for EICAT assessment
Confidence rating
Mechanism(s) of maximum impact
Countries of most severe impact
Description of impacts
Assessor
Contributors
Reviewers
Recommended citation
(2024). Cynoglossum officinale. IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT).