• General
  • Distribution
  • Impact
  • Management
  • Bibliography
  • Contact
Common name
carpita roja (Spanish), red horse minnow (English), red shiner (English)
Synonym
Leuciscus lutrensis , (Baird and Girard, 1853)
Notropis lutrensis , (Baird and Girard, 1853)
Similar species
Summary
Cyprinella lutrensis commonly known as red shiner, is native to the rivers and streams of the Midwest of the United States. Its use as bait has helped in expanding its range to include the southwest of the United States and Mexico. The fish prefers disturbed areas where there are few other cyprinids. They are known to eat small invertebrates and spawn in the mid-summer months.
Species Description
Cyprinella lutrensis is a mix of olive green and silver on its sides (TPWD, 2007). The scales are diamond shaped and outlined in crosshatch pattern. The \"lateral band extends 1/3 of the way forward. The beginning of the dorsal fin is close to the start of the pelvic fin (ColoState, undated). The dorsal fin has 7-8 rays. The anal fin has 8-10 rays, although 9 is most commonly seen (TPWD, 2007). There is a triangle on the side behind the head (ColoState, undated).
Lifecycle Stages
The eggs of C. lutrensis are layed on many different substrates such as gravel and vegetation (Wang, 1986). The larvae emerge after about 105 hours (NatureServe, 2006). C. lutrensis mature in a years time and its lifespan is 3 years (Wang, 1986).
Uses
Cyprinella lutrensis is commonly used as a bait fish (TPWD, 2007). This fish is also sold for use in aquariums (USGS, 2005).
Habitat Description
Cyprinella lutrensis populations are usually located where there are few other cyprinids. They can be found in turbid water, muddy river beds, and unstable banks (Douglas et al. 1994). It is rare for C. lutrensis to establish itself in undisturbed areas (Baltz and Moyle, 1993). In Wyoming this species was found mostly at elevations of < 250m (Quist et al. 2004). It can also be found in backwaters, creek mouths, mid-sized streams with sandy and silty bottoms, rocky pools, and riffles (NatureServe, 2006).
Reproduction
C. lutrensis spawns from spring into fall. The peak is during the mid-summer months. The actual spawning occurs \"on riffles, on or near submerged, over vegetation beds, or in association with sunfish nests (TPWD, 2007). The eggs hatch at a temperature of 24.5°C. The offspring will be sexually mature in 1-2 years (NatureServe, 2006).
Nutrition
C. lutrensis is considered an invertivore because it feeds on small invertabrates such as insects and crustraceans (NatureServe, 2006). According to Wang (1986), plant leaves were found in the stomachs of young C. lutrensis.
Pathway
Bait release is how C. lutrensis spread into rivers and streams ouside its native range in the midwest of the United States (USGS, 2005).

Principal source: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2007. Red Shiner Cyprinella lutrensis.; NatureServe. 2006. Online Encyclopedia of Life. Cyprinella lutrensis.

Compiler: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)

Review:

Publication date: 2007-05-14

Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Cyprinella lutrensis. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1148 on 30-04-2024.

General Impacts
At the end of the 1970s the natural spread of C. lutrensis was through use as a baitfish which led it to New Mexico. With this also came the disappearance of the native spikedace (Meda fulgida) (Douglas et al. 1994). The niche of the native spikedace changes when it co-exists with C. lutrensis (Mooney and Cleland, 2001).

C. lutrensis has been said to be the cause of the decline of the endangered woundfin (see Plagopterus argentissimus in IUCN Red List of Threatened Species) and Virgin River chub (see Gila seminuda in the US Federal Register. Both species occur within the area designated as critical habitat (includes portions of the Virgin River in Utah, Arizona, and Nevada) (NatureServe, 2006) where C. lutrensis is the most numerous and the most problematic among a list of fourteen introduced fish, that prey on and compete with the two listed fish (The Federal Register Environmental Documents, 2000). They compete for food and available habitats and are known to prey on the eggs and early life stages of the listed fishes.

Countries (or multi-country features) with distribution records for Cyprinella lutrensis
ALIEN RANGE
NATIVE RANGE
  • united states
Informations on Cyprinella lutrensis has been recorded for the following locations. Click on the name for additional informations.
Lorem Ipsum
Location Status Invasiveness Occurrence Source
Details of Cyprinella lutrensis in information
Status
Invasiveness
Arrival date
Occurrence
Source
Introduction
Species notes for this location
Location note
Management notes for this location
Impact
Mechanism:
Outcome:
Ecosystem services:
Impact information
At the end of the 1970s the natural spread of C. lutrensis was through use as a baitfish which led it to New Mexico. With this also came the disappearance of the native spikedace (Meda fulgida) (Douglas et al. 1994). The niche of the native spikedace changes when it co-exists with C. lutrensis (Mooney and Cleland, 2001).

C. lutrensis has been said to be the cause of the decline of the endangered woundfin (see Plagopterus argentissimus in IUCN Red List of Threatened Species) and Virgin River chub (see Gila seminuda in the US Federal Register. Both species occur within the area designated as critical habitat (includes portions of the Virgin River in Utah, Arizona, and Nevada) (NatureServe, 2006) where C. lutrensis is the most numerous and the most problematic among a list of fourteen introduced fish, that prey on and compete with the two listed fish (The Federal Register Environmental Documents, 2000). They compete for food and available habitats and are known to prey on the eggs and early life stages of the listed fishes.

Red List assessed species 1: CR = 1;
View more species View less species
Locations
Mechanism
[2] Competition
Outcomes
[2] Environmental Ecosystem - Habitat
  • [2] Reduction in native biodiversity
Management information
Bibliography
17 references found for Cyprinella lutrensis

Management information
Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (CEFAS)., 2008. Decision support tools-Identifying potentially invasive non-native marine and freshwater species: fish, invertebrates, amphibians.
Summary: The electronic tool kits made available on the Cefas page for free download are Crown Copyright (2007-2008). As such, these are freeware and may be freely distributed provided this notice is retained. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made and users should satisfy themselves as to the applicability of the results in any given circumstance. Toolkits available include 1) FISK- Freshwater Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit (English and Spanish language version); 2) MFISK- Marine Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit; 3) MI-ISK- Marine invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit; 4) FI-ISK- Freshwater Invertebrate Invasiveness Scoring Kit and AmphISK- Amphibian Invasiveness Scoring Kit. These tool kits were developed by Cefas, with new VisualBasic and computational programming by Lorenzo Vilizzi, David Cooper, Andy South and Gordon H. Copp, based on VisualBasic code in the original Weed Risk Assessment (WRA) tool kit of P.C. Pheloung, P.A. Williams & S.R. Halloy (1999).
The decision support tools are available from: http://cefas.defra.gov.uk/our-science/ecosystems-and-biodiversity/non-native-species/decision-support-tools.aspx [Accessed 13 October 2011]
The guidance document is available from http://www.cefas.co.uk/media/118009/fisk_guide_v2.pdf [Accessed 13 January 2009].
Mendoza, R.E.; Cudmore, B.; Orr, R.; Balderas, S.C.; Courtenay, W.R.; Osorio, P.K.; Mandrak, N.; Torres, P.A.; Damian, M.A.; Gallardo, C.E.; Sanguines, A.G.; Greene, G.; Lee, D.; Orbe-Mendoza, A.; Martinez, C.R.; and Arana, O.S. 2009. Trinational Risk Assessment Guidelines for Aquatic Alien Invasive Species. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. 393, rue St-Jacques Ouest, Bureau 200, Montr�al (Qu�bec), Canada. ISBN 978-2-923358-48-1.
Summary: In 1993, Canada, Mexico and the United States signed the North American Agreement on Environmental Cooperation (NAAEC) as a side agreement to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The NAAEC established the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) to help the Parties ensure that improved economic efficiency occurred simultaneously with trinational environmental cooperation. The NAAEC highlighted biodiversity as a key area for trinational cooperation. In 2001, the CEC adopted a resolution (Council Resolution 01-03), which created the Biodiversity Conservation Working Group (BCWG), a working group of high-level policy makers from Canada, Mexico and the United States. In 2003, the BCWG produced the �Strategic Plan for North American Cooperation in the Conservation of Biodiversity.� This strategy identified responding to threats, such as invasive species, as a priority action area. In 2004, the BCWG, recognizing the importance of prevention in addressing invasive species, agreed to work together to develop the draft CEC Risk Assessment Guidelines for Aquatic Alien Invasive Species (hereafter referred to as the Guidelines). These Guidelines will serve as a tool to North American resource managers who are evaluating whether or not to introduce a non-native species into a new ecosystem. Through this collaborative process, the BCWG has begun to implement its strategy as well as address an important trade and environment issue. With increased trade comes an increase in the potential for economic growth as well as biological invasion, by working to minimize the potential adverse impacts from trade, the CEC Parties are working to maximize the gains from trade while minimizing the environmental costs.
Available from: English version: http://www.cec.org/Storage/62/5516_07-64-CEC%20invasives%20risk%20guidelines-full-report_en.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2010]
French version: http://www.cec.org/Storage/62/5517_07-64-CEC%20invasives%20risk%20guidelines-full-report_fr.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2010]
Spanish version: http://www.cec.org/Storage/62/5518_07-64-CEC%20invasives%20risk%20guidelines-full-report_es.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2010].
The Federal Register Environmental Documents, 2000. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Woundfin and Virgin River Chub
Summary: Available from: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-SPECIES/2000/January/Day-26/e1746.htm [Accessed March 19 2007]
General information
Ashbaugh, N.A., R.K. Reichert, S.E. Franklin, M.N. Mercer, H.A. Lanman, B.S. Mantooth. 1996. A Comparative Study of the Ichthyofauna in Selected Streams on the Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge in Oklahoma. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 76: 17-21.
Summary: This paper lists fishes and their abundances in seine collections from streams of the Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge (SPNWR) in Oklahoma.
Available from: http://digital.library.okstate.edu/OAS/oas_pdf/v76/p17_21.pdf [Accessed March 19, 2007]
Baltz, D.M., Boyle, P.B. 1993. Invasion Resistance to Introduced Species by a Native Assemblage of California Stream Fishes. Ecological Applications. 3(2): 246-255.
Summary: This article discusses how native fishes that live in undisturbed habitats are more prone to resist invasion than in an undisturbed habitat.
Brandenburg, W.H., K.B. Gido. 1999. Predation by nonnative fish on native fishes in the San Juan River, New Mexico and Utah. Southwest. Nat. 44(3): 392-394.
Summary: This article discusses the different feeding behaviors of fish in the San Juan River, New Mexico.
Douglas, M.E., P.C. Marsh, W.E. Minkley. 1994. Indigenous Fishes of Western North America and the Hypothesis of Competitive Displacement: Meda fulgida (Cyprinidae) as a Case Study. Copeia. 1: 9-19.
Summary: This study was conducted to see how the red shiner and spikedace interact and if one impacts the other by the limiting of resources, etc.
Gimenez Dixon, M. 1996. Plagopterus argentissimus. In: IUCN 2006. 2006 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Summary: Available from: http://www.iucnredlist.org/search/details.php/17468/all [Accessed March 19 2007]
ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System), 2006. Online Database Cyprinella lutrensis.
Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and Bioscience from BioOne journals.
Available from: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=163792 [Accessed March 19, 2007]
Matthews, W.J. 1987. Geographic Variation in Cyprinella lutrensis (Pisces: Cyprinidae) in the United States, with Notes on Cyprinella lepida. Copeia. 1987(3):616-637.
Summary: This discusses the distribution of subspecies of Cyprinella lutrensis in the United States.
Mooney, H.A., E.E. Cleland. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. PNAS. 98(10): 1-6.
Summary: This paper addresses how invasive species alter the environment and how they alter their own evolutionary pathways.
Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/10/5446 [Accessed March 19. 2007]
NatureServe. 2006. Online Encyclopedia of Life. Cyprinella lutrensis.
Summary: This website offers information on all ecological aspects of animals.
Available from: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Cyprinella%20lutrensis [Accessed March 19. 2007]
Nonindigenous Aquatic Species (NAS), 2005. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Collection Information: Cyprinella lutrensis.
Summary: This website gives collection information on Cyprinella lutrensis in the United States.
Available from: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/collectioninfo.asp?SpeciesID=518 [Accessed March 19, 2007]
Quist, M.C., W.A. Hubert, F.J. Rahel. 2004. Elevation and Stream-Size Thresholds Affect Distributions of Native and Exotic Warmwater Fishes in Wyoming. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 19(2): 227-236.
Summary: This study was conducted to assess the influence of elevation and stream width on the occurrence of 28 native and six exotic fish species using data collected (1954-2003) from 1,114 stream reaches in Wyoming.
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2007. Red Shiner Cyprinella lutrensis.
Summary: This website gives a full description, life history, and distibution of the chosen animal.
Available from: http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/huntwild/wild/species/redshiner/ [Accessed March 19, 2007]
Wang, J.S.C. 1986. Fishes of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary and Adjacent Waters, California: A Guide to the Early Life Histories. California Department of Water Resources, California Department of Fish and Game, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Contact
The following 0 contacts offer information an advice on Cyprinella lutrensis
Cyprinella lutrensis
carpita roja, red horse minnow, red shiner
Date assessed
Year published
Eicat category
Justification for EICAT assessment
Confidence rating
Mechanism(s) of maximum impact
Countries of most severe impact
Description of impacts
Assessor
Contributors
Reviewers
Recommended citation
(2024). Cyprinella lutrensis. IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT).