Global invasive species database

  • General
  • Distribution
  • Impact
  • Management
  • Bibliography
  • Contact
Common name
Indian spotted deer (English), axis deer (English), chital (English)
Synonym
Cervus axis
Similar species
Summary
Axis axis is an introduced species of deer from India. It has historically been introduced to various locations because of its desirable qualities as a game species. When herd populations become too large they impact local vegetation and increase erosion. They also forage on a variety of vegetation removing food sources for many native species and domestic cattle. They also carry transmissible diseases and pose an increased threat to human safety in and around highway corridors.
Species Description
Axis axis is a moderately large deer standing 88-97cm at the shoulders. It has a rufous brown coat that is covered with white spots on the abdomen, rump, throat, insides of legs and ears and underside of tail that persist throughout the life of the animal. A dark stripe runs down the back from the nape to the tip of the tail. A gland-bearing cleft is present on the front of the pastern of the hind foot. A. axis dental formula is similar to elk, Cervus elaphus, but the upper canines (the so-called \"elk teeth\") are lacking. Males measure an average total length of 1.7m with a tail 200mm in length and their height at the shoulder can reach 90cm. Females are generally smaller. Weights can reach 66-113kg in males and 43-66kg in females (Mungall and Sheffield, 1994). Antlers are present only on bucks, and immediately upon shedding a set of antlers, growth begins on the next set. The larger the antlers, the longer the development period, from \"velvet\" through to \"hard\" antler. Antlers over 76cm take roughly five months to fully develop. Each antler has three tines; the brow tine forms at near right angle with the beam and the front (or outer) tine of the terminal fork is much longer than the hind (or inner) tine.
Notes
Axis axis was originally classified as Cervus axis, making it a species of elk. However, the classification was shifted in the 1950's, elevating Axis to its own genus. Today, there are two distinct species in the Axis genus: A. axis (chital) and A. porcinus (hog deer). Furthermore, A. axis now contains three subspecies: In India and Nepal there is A. axis axis, Sri Lanka hosts the closely related A. axis cylonensis, and at least one more subspecies exists and is recognised as A. axis calamaniensis (Anderson, 1999).
Lifecycle Stages
Davis and Schmidly (1997) report that Axis axis fawns begin eating green forage by 5½ weeks of age, but weaning is delayed until they reach 4-6 months of age. Permanent dentition is acquired when 2½-3 years of age and adult size is reached at 6 years for females and 4-5 years for males. The natural lifespan of A. axis is 9-13 years, although zoo animals may reach 18-22 years of age. A. axis are gregarious and found in herds ranging from a few animals to 100 or more. The leader is usually an old, experienced doe. Adult males are normally found living with herds of young and old animals of both sexes. Rutting males vocalise via a bugle-like bellow and both sexes have alarm calls or barks (Davis and Schmidly, 1997).
Uses
The meat of Axis axis (venison) is highly regarded as it is extremely lean. As a result, there is an economic value for the meat. Poaching and blackmarket sales are common wherever A. axis occur. The axis deer is a prized hunting quarry, owing to its beauty, especially bucks with antlers > 76cm. Many game ranches receive upwards of US$1000 for each trophy buck taken (Anderson, 1999).
Habitat Description
Axis axis are found almost exclusively at lower elevations (below ~ 1000m) throughout dry and mixed deciduous forest habitat and secondary forest lands broken by glades, with an understorey of grasses, forbs and tender shoots which supply adequate drinking water and shade. They are most commonly associated with a mixture of forest and more open grass-shrub, but they occupy a wide range of habitats throughout their native range, often avoiding rugged terrain. Their native range is characterised by significant seasonal changes in temperature and, more significantly, extreme swings in precipitation. The deer regularly encounter long periods of drought and poor forage availability, as well as widespread flooding and lush seasonal growth during the rainy season (Anderson, 1999; and Davis and Schmidly, 1997).
Reproduction
In the wild, Axis axis bucks are found throughout the year with hardened antlers and in rutting condition. The reproductive cycle of each individual is not synchronised with that of other males in the herd. Concurrently, throughout the year, some bucks are coming into rut, while others are going out of rut, or are in a non-breeding condition. Females also experience non-synchronised estrous cycles, with each cycle lasting about 3 weeks. Bucks do not retain harems of does, but instead mate with does in each herd as they become receptive. One fawn is typically produced per pregnancy and gestation lasts 210-238 days. Following parturition, females again mate during the subsequent breeding period. Adult females tend to produce one fawn each year (Davis and Schmidly, 1997).
Nutrition
Axis axis consume an extremely wide range of forage items throughout their native range and in introduced locales. They eat over 75 species of plants, as well as the full spectrum of plant parts including leaves, stems, fruits, seeds, flowers and bark. Their diet consists largely of grasses in all seasons, augmented with browse. Green grasses less than 10cm high are preferred. In Texas, they graze on grasses such as paspalum, switch grass and little bluestem. Sedges are favourite spring foods. Browse species include live oak, hackberry and sumac (Anderson, 1999; and Davis and Schmidly, 1997).
Pathway
Many game ranches receive upwards of $1000 for each trophy buck taken (Anderson, 1999).

Principal source: Anderson, 1999. Axis Deer Overview & Profile
Davis and Schmidly, 1997. The Mammals of Texas.

Compiler: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)

Review: Tyler A. Campbell, PhD. Research Wildlife Biologist Field Station Leader USDA-APHIS-WS National Wildlife Research Center Texas Field Station USA

Publication date: 2010-01-25

Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2018) Species profile: Axis axis. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=972 on 19-08-2018.

General Impacts
Axis axis often congregate in large groups and return to, and remain in, areas for long periods of time. When they occupy riparian areas, they heavily trample and browse vegetation. During the rut (reproductive season) significant impact to trees occurs when bucks rub and polish their antlers on bark, frequently leading to the death of the trees. This results in a loss of the stability that vegetation provides, with resulting destabilisation of stream banks, changes in stream flow and increased erosion and sedimentation of streams, ponds and rivers. When deer populations become too large, their trailing behaviour creates dirt pathways through even the thickest of vegetation. These trails can lead to significant erosion and, in wet forest areas, increase runoff by decreasing the mossy layer available that would normally retain water (Anderson, 1999; and the National Park Service, 2004).

\r\nAnderson (1999) reports that A. axis cause crop damage when natural forage is scarce. In their introduced range, they can also compete directly with cattle for forage. Although they prefer to graze grass, it is clear that the deer will respond to available forage conditions and eat what is available to them, which causes damage to local native species. A. axis can also graze forage grasses and other plants much closer to the ground than domesticated species. In extreme drought conditions, A. axis will eat bark off trees (Anderson, 1999).

\r\nA. axis have been found to carry and transmit bovine tuberculosis and several other diseases. They carry common parasites that can directly affect humans if and when droppings enter freshwater systems. Parasitic zoonoses harbored by A. axis include: leptospirosis, cryptosporidiosis, and strains of Escherichia coli (Anderson, 1999).

Management Info
Preventative measures: Risk Assessment models for assessing the risk that exotic vertebrates could establish in Australia have been further explored by the Western Australia Department of Agriculture & Food (DAFWA) to confirm that they reasonably predict public safety, establishment and pest risks across a full range of exotic species and risk levels.
The Risk assessment for the Axis deer (Axis axis), has been assigned a VPC Threat Category of EXTREME.
Mammals and birds were assessed for the pest risk they pose if introduced to Australia, by calculating Vertebrate Pests Committee (VPC) Threat Categories. These categories incorporate risk of establishing populations in the wild, risk of causing public harm, and risk of becoming a pest (eg causing agricultural damage, competing with native fauna, etc). The 7-factor Australian Bird and Mammal Model was used for these assessments. \r\n

Physical: The most successful control strategies for A. axis has been a combination of fencing and hunting. Control by fencing is not 100% and deer often escape. A. axis are able to jump over 2m fencing and studies show that 3m or higher fencing is required to adequately keep A. axis out of, or inside, an area.
Once A. axis become established in urban and suburban areas, hunting does not remain a practical method of control, therefore it is best to gain control of A. axis populations before they become established in suburban areas (Anderson, 1999; and the University of Hawai‘I, Undated).

Biological: Reproductive control using such techniques as contraception and sterilisation are possibilities for management but are expensive and time-consuming, requiring many man hours of labor intensive field work. New Zealand controls its exotic deer populations through recreational and commercial hunting, which have been very effective.

Countries (or multi-country features) with distribution records for Axis axis
ALIEN RANGE
NATIVE RANGE
  • india
  • nepal
  • sri lanka
Informations on Axis axis has been recorded for the following locations. Click on the name for additional informations.
Lorem Ipsum
Location Status Invasiveness Occurrence Source
Details of Axis axis in information
Status
Invasiveness
Arrival date
Occurrence
Source
Introduction
Species notes for this location
Location note
Management notes for this location
Impact
Mechanism:
Outcome:
Ecosystem services:
Impact information
Axis axis often congregate in large groups and return to, and remain in, areas for long periods of time. When they occupy riparian areas, they heavily trample and browse vegetation. During the rut (reproductive season) significant impact to trees occurs when bucks rub and polish their antlers on bark, frequently leading to the death of the trees. This results in a loss of the stability that vegetation provides, with resulting destabilisation of stream banks, changes in stream flow and increased erosion and sedimentation of streams, ponds and rivers. When deer populations become too large, their trailing behaviour creates dirt pathways through even the thickest of vegetation. These trails can lead to significant erosion and, in wet forest areas, increase runoff by decreasing the mossy layer available that would normally retain water (Anderson, 1999; and the National Park Service, 2004).

\r\nAnderson (1999) reports that A. axis cause crop damage when natural forage is scarce. In their introduced range, they can also compete directly with cattle for forage. Although they prefer to graze grass, it is clear that the deer will respond to available forage conditions and eat what is available to them, which causes damage to local native species. A. axis can also graze forage grasses and other plants much closer to the ground than domesticated species. In extreme drought conditions, A. axis will eat bark off trees (Anderson, 1999).

\r\nA. axis have been found to carry and transmit bovine tuberculosis and several other diseases. They carry common parasites that can directly affect humans if and when droppings enter freshwater systems. Parasitic zoonoses harbored by A. axis include: leptospirosis, cryptosporidiosis, and strains of Escherichia coli (Anderson, 1999).

Mechanism
[2] Competition
[1] Disease transmission
[2] Grazing/Herbivory/Browsing
[1] Trampling
Outcomes
[3] Environmental Ecosystem - Habitat
  • [2] Reduction in native biodiversity
  • [1] Habitat degradation
[1] Environmental Species - Population
  • [1] Plant/animal health
[3] Socio-Economic
  • [1] Damage to agriculture
  • [2] Reduce/damage livestock and products
Management information
Preventative measures: Risk Assessment models for assessing the risk that exotic vertebrates could establish in Australia have been further explored by the Western Australia Department of Agriculture & Food (DAFWA) to confirm that they reasonably predict public safety, establishment and pest risks across a full range of exotic species and risk levels.
The Risk assessment for the Axis deer (Axis axis), has been assigned a VPC Threat Category of EXTREME.
Mammals and birds were assessed for the pest risk they pose if introduced to Australia, by calculating Vertebrate Pests Committee (VPC) Threat Categories. These categories incorporate risk of establishing populations in the wild, risk of causing public harm, and risk of becoming a pest (eg causing agricultural damage, competing with native fauna, etc). The 7-factor Australian Bird and Mammal Model was used for these assessments. \r\n

Physical: The most successful control strategies for A. axis has been a combination of fencing and hunting. Control by fencing is not 100% and deer often escape. A. axis are able to jump over 2m fencing and studies show that 3m or higher fencing is required to adequately keep A. axis out of, or inside, an area.
Once A. axis become established in urban and suburban areas, hunting does not remain a practical method of control, therefore it is best to gain control of A. axis populations before they become established in suburban areas (Anderson, 1999; and the University of Hawai‘I, Undated).

Biological: Reproductive control using such techniques as contraception and sterilisation are possibilities for management but are expensive and time-consuming, requiring many man hours of labor intensive field work. New Zealand controls its exotic deer populations through recreational and commercial hunting, which have been very effective.

Management Category
Bibliography
16 references found for Axis axis

Managment information
Anderson, S. B. 1999. Axis Deer Overview & Profile. Following the Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in Hawaii Questionnaire.
Summary: Available from: http://www.hear.org/hnis/reports/HNIS-AxiAxiV01.pdf [Accessed 17 December 2007]
Bomford, M., 2003. Risk Assessment for the Import and Keeping of Exotic Vertebrates in Australia. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.
Summary: Available from: http://www.feral.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/PC12803.pdf [Accessed August 19 2010]
Massam M, Kirkpatrick W and Page A., 2010. Assessment and prioritisation of risk for forty introduced animal species. Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra.
Summary: This report documents work contributing to a project commissioned by the Invasive Animals Cooperative Research Centre to validate and refine risk assessment models used in decisions to import and manage introduced vertebrate species. The intent of the project was to: a) increase predictive accuracy, scientific validation and adoption of risk assessment models for the import and keeping of exotic vertebrates, and b) reduce the risk of new vertebrate pests establishing introduced populations in Australia.
Available from: http://www.feral.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/DAFWA_RA_060510.pdf [Accessed 16 March 2011]
Page, Amanda; Win Kirkpatrick and Marion Massam, May 2008, Axis Deer (Axis axis) risk assessment for Australia, Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia.
Summary: Models for assessing the risk that exotic vertebrates could establish in Australia have been developed for mammals, birds (Bomford 2003; Bomford 2006, 2008), reptiles and amphibians (Bomford 2006, 2008; Bomford et al. 2005). These Risk Assessment models have been further explored by Western Australia Department of Agriculture & Food (DAFWA) to confirm that they reasonably predict public safety, establishment and pest risks across a full range of exotic species and risk levels. Mammals and birds were assessed for the pest risk they pose if introduced to Australia, by calculating Vertebrate Pests Committee (VPC) Threat Categories. These categories incorporate risk of establishing populations in the wild, risk of causing public harm, and risk of becoming a pest (eg causing agricultural damage, competing with native fauna, etc). The 7-factor Australian Bird and Mammal Model was used for these assessments.
University of Hawaii. UNDATED. Axis Deer in Hawaii.
General information
Asher, G. W., D. S. Gallagher, M. L. Tate, and C. Tedford. . 1999. Hybridization between Sika Deer (Cervus Nippon) and Axis Deer (Axis axis). The Journal of Heredity 90(1):236-240.
Council of Europe. 2002. Report on the activities related to the implementation of the Recommendations No. 57 (1997) and No. 77 (1999) of the Bern Convention. Republic of Croatia: Ministry of Environmental Protection and Physical Planning : T-PVS (2002) 11.
Davis, W. B., and D. J. Schmidly. 1997. The Mammals of Texas . Texas Tech University & Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.
Summary: Available from: http://www.nsrl.ttu.edu/tmot1/cervaxis.htm [Accessed 09 January 2006]
Fox Free Task Force. Undated. Selected ecologically significant invasive species extent and impact: Vertebrate pests( indicator status: for advice). Parks and Wildlife Service.
ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System), 2005. Online Database Axis axis
Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and bioscience articles from BioOne journals.
Available from: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=552474 [Accessed 19 February 2008]
Jaksic, F.M., J. A. Iriarte, J. E. Jimenez, and D. R. Martinez. 2002. Invaders without frontiers: cross-border invasions of exotic mammals. Biological Invasions 4: 157-173, 2002.
Kravets, J. 2005. National Seashore wants rid of un-American deer . Point Reyes Light.
Summary: Available from: http://www.ptreyeslight.com/stories/feb10_05/deer.html [Accessed 09 January 2006]
National Park Service. 2004. Chapter 1: Purpose and Need. Non-native deer Management plan draft Environmental Impact Assessment: Point Reyes National Seashore.
Vazquez, D. P. 2002. Multiple effects of introduced mammalian herbivores in a temperate forest. Biological Invasions 4: 175-191, 2002.
Contact
The following 1 contacts offer information an advice on Axis axis
Campbell,
Tyler A
Organization:
Research Wildlife Biologist Field Station Leader
Address:
USDA-APHIS-WS National Wildlife Research Center Texas Field Station Texas A&M University-Kingsville MSC 218, 700 University Blvd. Kingsville, TX 78363
Phone:
(361) 593-2426
Fax:
(361) 593-4311