• General
  • Distribution
  • Impact
  • Management
  • Bibliography
  • Contact
Common name
 
Synonym
Similar species
Summary
Rosa bracteata (Macartney rose) is an evergreen perennial shrub, native to Asia, that has been introduced to the United States as an ornamental and used for livestock containment, erosion control, enrichment and cross-breeding rose cultivars. Since its introduction, Rosa bracteata has become invasive throughout the southeastern United States, especially in Texas where it is estimated to inhabit more than 250,000ha. It forms dense thickets and dominates habitats resulting in the reduction of foraging capacity of pastures and grasslands it readily overtakes and the displacement of native species.
Species Description
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is an evergreen, thorny shrub bearing alternate, pinnately compound obovate leaves with serrated margins. Leaflets are dark green, leathery, and 2.5-8cm long. Its flowers, white with five petals and many yellow anthers, occur in small clusters. The fruits are small hips about 1cm in diameter and may be green or yellow which ripen to red. It grows in climbing, arching, or trailing shrubs about that may merge into thickets 3.5 height and several meters in diameter. Stems are arching canes with frequent recurved or straight thorns. It commonly grows in large clumps that may form inmpenetrable mounds 6m high (Grace et al. 2001; Everitt et al. 2002; Amrine Jr., 2003; TexasInvasives, 2004)
Lifecycle Stages
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is a perennial with flowers bloom spring, fruits develop late summer through winter (TexasInvasives, 2004).
Uses
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is a popular ornamental, used as a hedge and livestock containment and erosion control. It also serves as a habitat and food source (hips) for wildlife (Everitt et al. 2002; Grace et al. 2001). R. bracteata is used in the hybridization of cultivars for its very dark, leathery, glossy, disease-resistant leaves and heat tolerant characteristics (Ueda, 2000).
Habitat Description
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) commonly occurs in shrublands, grasslands, and disturbed areas such as rangeland, right-of-ways, fence lines, drainage ditches, and river bottoms. It prefers clayey soil and warm climate (TexasInvasives, 2004; Ueda, 2000).
Reproduction
Sexual. Perennial. Hips readily consumed and seeds germinate from animal and bird feces (TexasInvasives, 2004).
Nutrition
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) produces a net photosynthetic rate of 18.7 µ mol m-2 s-1 at saturation irrradiances. Prefers higher light intesities and clayey soils (Ueda, 2000; TexasInvasive, 2004).

Principal source:

Compiler: National Biological Information Infrastructure (NBII) & IUCN/SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG)

Review: Dr. Walter Lewis, Professor Emeritus, Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis

Publication date: 2010-06-04

Recommended citation: Global Invasive Species Database (2024) Species profile: Rosa bracteata. Downloaded from http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/species.php?sc=1390 on 02-05-2024.

General Impacts
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is aggressive invasive forming dense thickets that displace native plants. Macartney rose competes with the endangered white bladderpod (Lesquerella pallida) in Texas. Encroachement by non-native species especially Macartney rose and honeysuckle are cited as the current most serious threat to the diminishing populations of the white bladderpod (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992). The Macartney rose also ruins grazing pastures. It has been introduced for livestock containment in many areas and its spread has become a problem. Vegetation unpalatable to grazing livestock, but hips are edible Since it exhibits rapid succession and recovery, it commonly dominates pastures which have been overgrazed or burned. Macartney rose is able to regenerate from shoot bases, root buds, or from decumbent shoots and is quick to recover and spread after burnings. Its low mortality, efficient regrowth, and beneficial adaptation to fire render it a highly invasive weed (TexasInvasives, 2004; Grace et al. 2001; Everitt et al, 2002).
Management Info
Preventative measures: Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is difficult to manage since it is a very tolerant and resilient species. Precautionary practices like using native species in livestock containment and gardening and taking care not to release or spread Macartney rose when hiking or traveling are important to managing its spread (TNC, 2008).

Physical: Mowing, bulldozing, chaining, and burning are all ineffective means of controlling R. bracteata, since it is a resilient plant that regrows quickly and is well adapted to fire. Mechanical control methods provide brief canopy reduction, increased foraging production, and facilitate livestock and machinery movement, but they are only short term means of control (Meyer & Bovey, 1984).

Chemical: R. bracteata is resistant to many herbicides. Relatively high concentrations of picloram and tebuthiuron granules, 4.5 kg/ha, are the best means of longterm control for R. bracteata. One Texas study tested seven different herbicides by spray and granule application. Only subsurface application of picloram at a 4.5 kg/ha rate and tebuthiuron at 2.2 and 4.5 kg/ha rates were effective. These treatments yeilded a canopy reduction of 74-79% (Meyer & Bovey, 1979). Subsequent studies have shown several successive sprays of 2,4-D, single applications of picloram, picloram and 2,4-D, or picloram and 2,4,5-T to reduce Macartney rose canopy by 95% 2 to 4 months following treatment, but populations recovered subsequently. Only picloram and tebuthiuron at 4.5 kg/ha maintained control through subsequent years (Meyer & Bovey, 1984). Herbicides chlorsulfuron and metsulfrom were only marginally effective (killing 15-43%) on Macartney rose (Meyer & Bovey, 1990). Another method of treatment recomends: \"Apply Escort at 1 ounce per acre in water (0.2 dry ounces in 3-gal. sprayer) with a surfactant to wet foliage in April to June (at or near the time of flowering). Or, apply Arsenal AC as a 1% solution in water (4 ounces in a 3-gal. sprayer) and a surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves in August to October. A less effective treatment with no soil activity to damage surrounding plants requires repeated applications of a glyphosate herbicide as a 2% solution in water (8 ounces in a 3-gal. sprayer) with a surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves in May to October. With all herbicides, spray foliage of climbing stems as high as possible. Cut-treat with a 10%-20% solution of a glyphosate herbicide (1-2 quarts in 3-gal. sprayer) in water with a surfactant (Miller, 2002).\"

Integrated management: The combination of herbicide application before prescribed burnings at 2-3 year intervals was shown to accomplish control previously requiring annual herbicide treatment. Similar long term results were obtained by the application of 5-10% picloram granules following a burning (Scifres, 1980).
Remote sensing using mean light relectance of aerial photography was proved to be an effective way of indentifying and quantifying Macartney rose populations. Its high near infrared reflectance provided for 100% identification accuracy (Everitt et al. 2002).

Countries (or multi-country features) with distribution records for Rosa bracteata
NATIVE RANGE
  • china
  • japan
  • taiwan
Informations on Rosa bracteata has been recorded for the following locations. Click on the name for additional informations.
Lorem Ipsum
Location Status Invasiveness Occurrence Source
Details of Rosa bracteata in information
Status
Invasiveness
Arrival date
Occurrence
Source
Introduction
Species notes for this location
Location note
Management notes for this location
Impact
Mechanism:
Outcome:
Ecosystem services:
Impact information
Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is aggressive invasive forming dense thickets that displace native plants. Macartney rose competes with the endangered white bladderpod (Lesquerella pallida) in Texas. Encroachement by non-native species especially Macartney rose and honeysuckle are cited as the current most serious threat to the diminishing populations of the white bladderpod (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992). The Macartney rose also ruins grazing pastures. It has been introduced for livestock containment in many areas and its spread has become a problem. Vegetation unpalatable to grazing livestock, but hips are edible Since it exhibits rapid succession and recovery, it commonly dominates pastures which have been overgrazed or burned. Macartney rose is able to regenerate from shoot bases, root buds, or from decumbent shoots and is quick to recover and spread after burnings. Its low mortality, efficient regrowth, and beneficial adaptation to fire render it a highly invasive weed (TexasInvasives, 2004; Grace et al. 2001; Everitt et al, 2002).
Red List assessed species 0:
Locations
UNITED STATES
Mechanism
[1] Competition
Outcomes
[1] Environmental Ecosystem - Habitat
  • [1] Reduction in native biodiversity
[1] Socio-Economic
  • [1] Damage to agriculture
Management information
Preventative measures: Macartney rose (Rosa bracteata) is difficult to manage since it is a very tolerant and resilient species. Precautionary practices like using native species in livestock containment and gardening and taking care not to release or spread Macartney rose when hiking or traveling are important to managing its spread (TNC, 2008).

Physical: Mowing, bulldozing, chaining, and burning are all ineffective means of controlling R. bracteata, since it is a resilient plant that regrows quickly and is well adapted to fire. Mechanical control methods provide brief canopy reduction, increased foraging production, and facilitate livestock and machinery movement, but they are only short term means of control (Meyer & Bovey, 1984).

Chemical: R. bracteata is resistant to many herbicides. Relatively high concentrations of picloram and tebuthiuron granules, 4.5 kg/ha, are the best means of longterm control for R. bracteata. One Texas study tested seven different herbicides by spray and granule application. Only subsurface application of picloram at a 4.5 kg/ha rate and tebuthiuron at 2.2 and 4.5 kg/ha rates were effective. These treatments yeilded a canopy reduction of 74-79% (Meyer & Bovey, 1979). Subsequent studies have shown several successive sprays of 2,4-D, single applications of picloram, picloram and 2,4-D, or picloram and 2,4,5-T to reduce Macartney rose canopy by 95% 2 to 4 months following treatment, but populations recovered subsequently. Only picloram and tebuthiuron at 4.5 kg/ha maintained control through subsequent years (Meyer & Bovey, 1984). Herbicides chlorsulfuron and metsulfrom were only marginally effective (killing 15-43%) on Macartney rose (Meyer & Bovey, 1990). Another method of treatment recomends: \"Apply Escort at 1 ounce per acre in water (0.2 dry ounces in 3-gal. sprayer) with a surfactant to wet foliage in April to June (at or near the time of flowering). Or, apply Arsenal AC as a 1% solution in water (4 ounces in a 3-gal. sprayer) and a surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves in August to October. A less effective treatment with no soil activity to damage surrounding plants requires repeated applications of a glyphosate herbicide as a 2% solution in water (8 ounces in a 3-gal. sprayer) with a surfactant to thoroughly wet all leaves in May to October. With all herbicides, spray foliage of climbing stems as high as possible. Cut-treat with a 10%-20% solution of a glyphosate herbicide (1-2 quarts in 3-gal. sprayer) in water with a surfactant (Miller, 2002).\"

Integrated management: The combination of herbicide application before prescribed burnings at 2-3 year intervals was shown to accomplish control previously requiring annual herbicide treatment. Similar long term results were obtained by the application of 5-10% picloram granules following a burning (Scifres, 1980).
Remote sensing using mean light relectance of aerial photography was proved to be an effective way of indentifying and quantifying Macartney rose populations. Its high near infrared reflectance provided for 100% identification accuracy (Everitt et al. 2002).

Locations
UNITED STATES
Management Category
Prevention
Control
Bibliography
32 references found for Rosa bracteata

Management information
Everitt, J. H. .; C. Yang, R. F. Wilson, M. A. Alaniz, M. R. Davis., 2002. Remote Sensing of Macartney Rose in the Texas Coastal Prairie. The Southwestern Naturalist, Vol. 47, No. 4 (Dec., 2002), pp. 566-575
Summary: An informative article on the use of remote sensing to identify Macartney rose.
Garoian, L; Conner, J.R; Scifres, C.J., 1984. Economic evaluation of fire-based improvement systems for Macartney rose. Journal of Range Management. Vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 111-115. 1984.
Summary: This study recommends combining herbicide treatment with burnings
Meyer, Robert E., 1982. Brush Response to Spacing and Individual-Plant Herbicide Treatments. Weed Science, Vol. 30, No. 4. (Jul., 1982), pp. 378-384.
Summary: A test of herbicides on Macartney rose and other weeds.
Meyer, Robert E; Rodney W. Bovey., 1979. Control of Honey Mesquite (Prosopis juliflora var. glandulosa) and Macartney Rose (Rosa bracteata) with Soil-Applied Herbicides. Weed Science, Vol. 27, No. 3. (May, 1979), pp. 280-284.
Summary: This article tests several herbicide control methods on Rosa bracteata and finds soil applied herbicides work best.
Meyer, Robert E; Rodney W. Bovey., 1984. Weed Control and Herbicide Technology Response of Macartney Rose (Rosa bracteata) and Understory Vegetation to Herbicides. Weed Science, Vol. 32, No. 1. (Jan., 1984), pp. 63-67.
Summary: A study of herbicides on controlling Macartney rose with long term observations.
Meyer, Robert E., Rodney W. Bovey, 1988. Weed Control and Herbicide Technology Tebuthiuron Formulation and Placement Effects on Response of Woody Plants and Soil Residue Weed Science, Vol. 36, No. 3. (May, 1988), pp. 373-378.
Summary: This study tests herbicides on Macartney rose along with other weeds.
Meyer, Robert E., Rodney W. Bovey, 1990. Weed Control and Herbicide Technology Influence of Sulfonylurea and Other Herbicides on Selected Woody and Herbaceous Species Weed Science, Vol. 38, No. 3. (May, 1990), pp. 249-255.
Summary: A study of herbicides on controlling Macartney rose and other invasives.
Miller, James. H., 2002. The Bugwood Network. Exotic Pest Plants and Their Control
Summary: Available from: http://www.bugwood.org/weeds/forestexotics.html [Accessed 11 February 2008]
Scifres, C.J. 1980. Integration of prescribed burning with other practices in brush management systems. In Hanselka, C. Wayne (Ed)., 1980 Prescribed Range Burning in the Coastal Prairie and Eastern Rio Grande Plains of Texas. Proceedings of a Symposium held October 16, 1980 at Kingsville, Texas
Summary: Burning as management technique
Available from: http://texnat.tamu.edu.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/symposia/prescribed_burning_coastal_prairie_eastern_rio_grande_plains.pdf#page=70 [Accessed 12 February 2008]
TexasInvasives.org., 2004. Plant Detail Page Rosa bracteata J.C. Wendl.
Summary: Available from: http://www.texasinvasives.org/Invasives_Database/Results/Detail.asp?Symbol=ROBR [Accessed 11 February 2008]
United States Forest Service. 2007. 2007 Volunteers working with invasives grants report form. Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge.
Summary: This management project targeted invasives threatening the grassland birds via reduction of foraging resources.
Varnham, K. 2006. Non-native species in UK Overseas Territories: a review. JNCC Report 372. Peterborough: United Kingdom.
Summary: This database compiles information on alien species from British Overseas Territories.
Available from: http://www.jncc.gov.uk/page-3660 [Accessed 10 November 2009]
General information
Alabama Invasive Plant Council (ALIPC)., undated. Alabama s 10 worst invasive weeds
Summary: Brief information concerning Macartney rose in Alabama
Available from: http://www.se-eppc.org/pubs/alabama.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2008]
Amrine Jr., J.W. 2003. Multiflora rose. Invasive Plants of the Eastern Invasive.org.
Summary: A profile on the Multiflora rose with a common name of Macartney rose.
Available from: http://www.invasive.org/eastern/biocontrol/22MultifloraRose.html [Accessed 25 February 2008].
DAISIE (Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe) 2009. Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. Invading Nature � Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, Vol. 3. Spring Science + Business Media B.V.
Summary: Biological invasions by alien (non-native) species are widely recognized as a significant component of human-caused global environmental change and the second most important cause of biodiversity decline. Alien species threaten many European ecosystems and have serious environmental, economic and health impacts. The DAISIE (Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe) project has now brought together all available information on alien species in Europe (terrestrial, aquatic and marine) and from all taxa (fungi, plants, animals). Thus for the first time, an overview and assessment of biological invasions in the Pan-European region is finally possible.

The Handbook of Alien Species in Europe summarises the major findings of this groundbreaking research and addresses the invasion trends, pathways, and both economic as well as ecological impact for eight major taxonomic groups. Approximately 11.000 alien species recorded in Europe are listed, and fact sheets for 100 of the most invasive alien species are included, each with a distribution map and colour illustration.

The book is complemented by a regularly updated internet database providing free additional information. With its highly interdisciplinary approach, DAISIE and its Handbook will be the basis for future scientific investigations as well as management and control of alien invasive species in Europe.

Preview available from: http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=_g-syyoXw2gC&pg=PA193&lpg=PA193&dq=europe+rosa+bracteata&source=bl&ots=XwrFKKQJwa&sig=pOQzowvD1OjQpMlVfu0C7xdyjO0&hl=en&ei=pj4ITOzxB4HBccDL9cUO&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCMQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=Rosa%20bracteata&f=false [Accessed 4 June, 2010]

Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System (EDDMapS)., 2008. Distribution Map: Macartney rose. Rosa bracteata J.C. Wendl.
Summary: Detailed US distribution information.
Available from: http://www.eddmaps.org/distribution/subdist.cfm?sub=4606 [Accessed 11 February 2008]
Early Detection and Distribution Mapping System (EDDMapS)., 2008. Species Information: Macartney rose. Rosa bracteata J.C. Wendl.
Summary: Available from: http://www.eddmaps.org/species/subject.cfm?sub=4606 [Accessed 11 February 2008]
ITIS (Integrated Taxonomic Information System), 2008. Online Database Rosa bracteata J.C. Wendl.
Summary: An online database that provides taxonomic information, common names, synonyms and geographical jurisdiction of a species. In addition links are provided to retrieve biological records and collection information from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Data Portal and bioscience articles from BioOne journals.
Available from: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=24817 [Accessed 12 February 2008]
NatureServe. 2008. Rosa bracteata - J.C. Wendl. Macartney s Rose NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.0. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia.
Summary: Available from: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Rosa bracteata[Accessed 25 February 2008].
Plant Conservation Aliance (PCA)- Alien Plant Working Group s., 2007. Alien Plant Invaders of Natural Areas: Macartney rose Rosa bracteata
Summary: Distribution information.
Available from: http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/map/robr1.htm [Accessed 11 February 2008]
Smithsonian Environmental Research Center. 2009. Chinese Mitten Crab Update. [Accessed January 14, 2009]
Summary: Available from: http://serc.si.edu/labs/marine_invasions/news/CHINESE_MITTEN_CRAB_UPDATE_APR21_09.pdf
Sweet. 2002 . Ralp Moore: The king of miniature roses. Department of Environmental Horticulture, Universtiy of California, Davis. Growing points. Vol. 6, No. 3: 3-4.
Summary: This article cites the introduction of Macartney rose to the UK.
Available from: http://www.plantsciences.ucdavis.edu/eh/Ehweb/Newsltr/2002/gpsummer2002.pdf [Accessed 25 February 2008].
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)., 2008. Invasive Plants.
Summary: Available from: http://www.nature.org/wherewework/northamerica/states/alabama/news/news1821.html [Accessed 11 February 2008]
Ueda, Y., Nishihara, S., Tomita, H. and Oda, Y. 2000. Photosynthetic response of Japanese rose species Rosa bracteata and Rosa rugosa to temperature and light. - Scientia Horticulturae 84,3/4: 365-371.
USDA, NRCS. 2008. The PLANTS Database Rosa bracteata J.C. Wendl. (http://plants.usda.gov, 11 February 2008). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874-4490 USA.
Summary: Distribution information
Available from: http://plants.usda.gov/java/profile?symbol=ROBR [Accessed 11 February 2008]
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. White Bladderpod (Lesquerella pallida) Recovery Plan. USD1 Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 22 pp.
Summary: Effects of Macartney rose on White Bladderpod (Lesquerella pallida) in Texas
Available from: http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/Documents/R2ES/WhiteBladderpod.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2008]
Williams, M. C., 1980. Purposefully Introduced Plants That Have Become Noxious or Poisonous Weeds. Weed Science, Vol. 28, No. 3. (May, 1980), pp. 300-305.
WWF Australia. 2006. National list of naturalised invasive and potentially invasive garden plants. Version: 1.2.
Summary: The national list identifies 1036 naturalised garden plant species and taxa that are actual or potential environmental and agricultural weeds. Available from: http://wwf.org.au/publications/ListInvasivePlants/
Contact
The following 0 contacts offer information an advice on Rosa bracteata
Rosa bracteata
Date assessed
Year published
Eicat category
Justification for EICAT assessment
Confidence rating
Mechanism(s) of maximum impact
Countries of most severe impact
Description of impacts
Assessor
Contributors
Reviewers
Recommended citation
(2024). Rosa bracteata. IUCN Environmental Impact Classification for Alien Taxa (EICAT).